Women's Hundred | Twitter reacts to Georgia’s fancy shot go wrong as Jonassen nails bullseye
The human mind loves to jump from one idea to another but it's important to be composed while participating in a live sporting event. The idea of switching to fancy attempts caused Georgia Adams her wicket during a crucial juncture of the Women’s Hundred clash against Welsh Fire on Monday.
Conceding just three runs in as many balls of the ninth set, Jonassen came around the wicket and floated an offie at the fourth stump line. Premeditating for a lap shot, Adams shuffled way too much across the line and ended up with an inside edge back to the stumps. The batter was too much inside the line that she failed to negate the slight drift, leading to her downfall at a crucial juncture of the game.
Seeing Adams’ wicket leading the Brave to a tricky phase in the context of the game, the Twitterverse abuzzed.
That was terrible!
— Gill Bill (@bill_gill76078)
LOL!
Anything can happen in the Women's Hundred. If Southern Brave scores 114-117, then even that might turn out to be enough. Who knows?
— Jeet (Women's Cricket) (@Jeetv27WC)
Across 4 seasons, the unpredictability has been very high in terms of results.
Pathetic?
At times Some of these teams in this women’s hundred have been totally dreadful, I’m not sure I can bet on these games anymore
— eddie rivers (@eddierivers00)
Looks like that?
this women's cricket at the hundred is awful. the standard is crap.
— Edward Bretherton (@eddybr1991)
Damn!!
First ball duck for in-form in the Women’s !
— Rohan Deshmukh 🇮🇳 (@ItsDeshmukh)
Cricket is a great leveller!
Brilliant start!
🏏Welsh Fire women bowl Southern Brave out for 84 after Smriti Mandhana fell first ball
— Nick Webb (@nickwebb2017)
Hayley Matthews 3-16, Freya Davies 2-12, Jess Jonassen 2-14
🎙️👉🏽
Yeah!
Wickets continue to fall with regularity, as Adams paddles Jonassen onto her stumps and departs for 17 (18).
— hypocaust (@_hypocaust)
Brave 63/5 (54)
livestream
Comments
Sign up or log in to your account to leave comments and reactions
0 Comments